<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aperture vs. Lightroom part two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertwrightphoto.com/writing/photography/aperture-vs-lightroom-part-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertwrightphoto.com/writing/photography/aperture-vs-lightroom-part-two/</link>
	<description>@ robertwrightphoto.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:36:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Nakroshis</title>
		<link>http://www.robertwrightphoto.com/writing/photography/aperture-vs-lightroom-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Nakroshis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 00:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertwrightphoto.com/writing/?p=50#comment-644</guid>
		<description>I agree with your comments about Lightroom&#039;s limitations and find Aperture is much better designed in this regard. 
It&#039;s funny though, although I have may images managed in Aperture, I like the visual design of Lightroom better. To my eyes, it is a beautiful interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your comments about Lightroom&#8217;s limitations and find Aperture is much better designed in this regard.<br />
It&#8217;s funny though, although I have may images managed in Aperture, I like the visual design of Lightroom better. To my eyes, it is a beautiful interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

